A relativism in question lies in the fact that there are no good deeds or bad. What is one major consequence - the council can not waste time, the council can not waste your life. Council can not do that because you can not make better use of time as I'm concerned, because the very notion of "better use" the time is untrue. As I said: there is no good or bad deeds.
And why is that? A few arguments, I just nawinęły arm:
first Not good or bad deeds because the same event may have different implications if we see them from different perspectives in time. It means that something that today seems to me good, for twelve years may not be entirely bad, or indifferent, or neuter. Or not at all be dissolved in the void.
second Depending on the situation, the same thing can be temporarily (see point 1) good or evil.
third So to say that the only the thing that defines "morality" of the state of consciousness is an entity which carries out the deed. Thing in itself is neutral. Simply is and so. I've been. There can therefore be attributed to the superiority of building the temple of stealing from the store. But anyway, given the points 1 and 2, even kradzenie may be OK. And certainly it will be OK if done in good, nieegoistycznym, enlightened state.
If, however, and that is all, all these arguments fail, and certainly fail, and so, strongly emphasizing the council can not waste time. What does it mean that watching TV is fine. It's just that boring tripe like oil.
0 comments:
Post a Comment